However, these same features can provide opportunities for misconduct in science, questionable research practices, and other misconduct. Individual scientists bear the primary responsibility for the conduct of their research, but local research institutions and sponsoring organizations also have responsibilities, in addition to implementing fair, sound, and well-defined mechanisms to investigate allegations of misconduct in science.
European balance of power and International relations of the Great Powers — The principle involved in preserving the balance of power as a conscious goal of foreign policy, as David Hume pointed out in his Essay on the Balance of Power, is as old as history, and was used by Greeks such as Thucydides both as political theorists and as practical statesmen.
Francesco SforzaDuke of Milanand Lorenzo de' Mediciruler of Florencewere the first rulers actively to pursue such a policy, with the Italic Leaguethough historians have generally[ citation needed ] attributed the innovation to the Medici rulers of Florence.
The term gained significance after the Treaty of Utrecht inwhere it was specifically mentioned. In accordance with this new discipline, the European states formed a sort of federal communitythe fundamental condition of which was the preservation of a balance of power, i. And, since all were equally interested in this settlement, it was held to be the interest, the rightand the duty of every power to interfere, even by force of arms, when any of the conditions of this settlement were infringed upon, or assailed by, any other member of the community.
Frederick the Greatin his Anti-Machiavel, proclaimed the 'balance of power' principle to the world. In Friedrich von Gentz re-stated it with admirable clarity, in Fragments on the Balance of Power. Yet, it underlaid all the efforts of diplomacy to stay, or to direct, the elemental forces of nationalism let loose by the French Revolution.
In the revolution's aftermath, with the restoration of comparative calm, the principle once more emerged as the operative motive for the various political alliances, of which the ostensible object was the preservation of peace.
Europe has known almost as much peace as war; and it has owed these periods of peace to the Balance of Power. No one state has ever been strong enough to eat up all the rest, and the mutual jealousy of the Great Powers has preserved even the small states, which could not have preserved themselves.
Atomic scientists launched an all-out attack on the balance-of-power concept: The balance-of-power system is discredited today. References to it, even by professional historians and international lawyers, commonly imply either that it was a system for war which repeatedly failed or that it was a system for making war which often succeeded in its purpose … During the period of its dominance as a European system, say, toits record in preventing war was certainly not striking.
Indeed, it probably was itself responsible for starting more wars than it prevented. Europe has a basic choice: Our choice is clear: The continental policy of England [after ] was fixed.
It was to be pacific, mediating, favorable to a balance which should prevent any power from having a hegemony on the continent or controlling the Channel coasts. Instead, for centuries "Europe has with only just sufficient intervals to enable the combatants to recruit their wasted energies been one vast and continued battle-field…"  He criticized Lord Bacon for his adherence to the balance of power as a universal rule: As for the rule of Lord Bacon: It would reduce us even below the level of animals… [T]his rule would, if acted upon universally, plunged us into a war of annihilation … nor would the leveling strife cease until either the rule were abrogated, or mankind had been reduced to the only pristine possessions—teeth and nails!
The size of the units which count effectively in international politics grows steadily larger. There is no longer room in Europe today for those three or four important and strong countries whose more or less equal rivalries enabled Great Britain in the past to secure herself through the policy of the balance of power.
Much nonsense has been talked in recent years about the balance of power. But the confusion of thought resulting from the attempt to brand it as a morally reprehensive policy has been less serious than the confusion resulting from the assumption that it is a policy which can be applied at all times and in all circumstances.
The principal military reason why … is that the balance of power in Europe has hopelessly broken down The possibility of restoring the balance did not exist after ; and British policy, based on a false premise, ended in disaster.
Churchill is a man with an out-of-date political idea—that of the European balance of power. It no longer belongs to the sphere of realities.
And yet it's because of this superstition that Churchill stirred England up to war.The development experiences of Third World countries since the fifties have been staggeringly diverse—and hence very informative.
Forty years ago the developing countries looked a lot more like each other than they do today. Ah, but super-human AI is not the only way Moloch can bring our demise.
How many such dangers can your global monarch identify in time? EMs, nanotechnology, memetic contamination, and all the other unknown ways we’re running to the bottom.
In my last post I discussed at length the question of rationality. I concluded that contrary to the opinion of behavioral economics, humans do make decisions that they believe to be in their best interests, in my view the correct definition of a rational decision.
Disclaimer: This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. You can view samples of our professional work here. Any. Ascent Tuition is a student loan that may help you pay for college with the help of a cosigner. Free local government papers, essays, and research papers.