Courts throughout the country are losing patience with attorneys and their poor writing skills. As a result, judges are issuing public reprimands, requiring attorneys to take legal writing courses and dismissing complaints for committing crimes against the English language such as excessive spelling errors, bad grammar and poor organization. As paralegals, we can be invaluable resources to attorneys by editing legal documents before they leave our offices. This article explores some of the consequences of bad legal writing and gives you the tools to help you prevent your attorney form facing these consequences.
South Carolina Introduction Assuring treatment of the sex partners of persons with sexually transmitted diseases STD has been a central component of prevention and control of bacterial STDs in the United States for decades.
Traditional practices to inform, evaluate and treat sex partners of persons infected with STDs have relied upon patients or health care providers to notify partners of infected persons of their exposure to an STD.
Initially developed to help control syphilis, partner management became widely recommended for gonorrhea, chlamydial infection and, most recently, human immunodeficiency virus HIV infection.
However, for STDs other than syphilis, partner management based on provider referral is rarely assured, while patient referral has had only modest success in assuring partner treatment. Guidelines for writing a legal brief alternative approach to assuring treatment of partners is expedited partner therapy EPT.
EPT is the delivery of medications or prescriptions by persons infected with an STD to their sex partners without clinical assessment of the partners. Throughout discussions of EPT, the legal status of the practice remained an area of uncertainty.
The results of this research, with explanatory information for six key areas of inquiry and summary conclusions for each state are presented here.
The information presented here is not legal advice, nor is it a comprehensive analysis of all the legal provisions that could implicate the legality of EPT in a given jurisdiction. Rather, it provides a comparative snapshot of legal provisions that may highlight legislative, regulatory, judicial laws and policies concerning EPT based on currently available information.
This snapshot is subject to change. Measuring the legal weight of non-binding legal sources, such as policy guidance documents or administrative decisions, must be done locally within the context of applicable statutes and regulations.
The data and assessment are intended to be used as a tool to assist state and local health departments as they determine locally appropriate ways to control STDs. Assessment of local statutes was not undertaken, with the exception of the District of Columbia.
Assessment of tribal laws for sovereign nations was also not undertaken. While these provisions may be limited in their application, they may effectually either authorize or prohibit EPT in specific circumstances. For example, a few states feature statutes or regulations that directly authorize some health care professionals to conduct EPT.
Specific judicial decisions concerning EPT or like practices. Case law decisions are legally binding in their jurisdictions and set legal precedent for future decisions. Specific administrative opinions by the Attorney General or medical or pharmacy boards concerning EPT or like practices.
Section III includes publicly-available decisions by state administrative bodies that discuss the legality of EPT or like practices.
These decisions can include opinions of the state Attorney General, actions by medical disciplinary boards, advisory decisions or resolutions of medical or pharmacy boards, or general policy guidelines.
Attorney General opinions are only binding on the party who sought the opinion, but the opinion may indicate how EPT may be regarded in the future.
Laws that incorporate via reference guidelines as acceptable practices including EPT. Section V includes legal provisions that allow public health or clinical practices to be incorporated by reference through specific guidelines.
Even if the current legal status of EPT in a jurisdiction is unclear, EPT could become legally permissible if a designated published guideline, agency, or official adopted EPT as an acceptable treatment method. The contents of these guidelines are incorporated by reference, which means they have the force of law in that jurisdiction.
Legalization of EPT may thus be furthered by consulting with the organization that publishes the guideline or the agency official to recognize EPT as an acceptable treatment method for specific STDs provided such recommendation does not conflict with other legal provisions.
The following abbreviations are used in this column of the table: Section VI includes statutory or regulatory provisions that relate to prescription drug laws other than for controlled substances in each jurisdiction to the extent they may impact EPT.
If identifying information is not required, it may facilitate a physician writing a prescription for a patient to deliver to her partner without identifying the partner.Download this free creative brief template to start your creative project and when working with agencies, freelancers, writers, marcom, public relations, designers.
brief (brēf) adj.
brief·er, brief·est 1. Short in time, duration, length, or extent. 2. Succinct; concise: a brief account of the incident. 3.
Curt; abrupt: We were upset. Abstract. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) covers a wide range of recommendations for making Web content more accessible.
Following these guidelines will make content accessible to. Legal/Policy Toolkit for Adoption and Implementation of Expedited Partner Therapy. Join Now Become a Member. Join NCRA, internationally recognized as the premier educational and informational resource for court reporting and captioning professionals.
Legal Guidelines for Escape Room Business (US/Canada Update) Do you sometimes feel like you need a law degree to run your escape room business?