Advanced Search Abstract The use of human embryos for research on embryonic stem ES cells is currently high on the ethical and political agenda in many countries. Despite the potential benefit of using human ES cells in the treatment of disease, their use remains controversial because of their derivation from early embryos.
The dignity of a person must be recognized in every human being from conception to natural death. The Instruction Donum vitae was particularly significant. And now, twenty years after its publication, it is appropriate to bring it up to date. The teaching of Donum vitae remains completely valid, both with regard to the principles on which it is based and the moral evaluations which it expresses.
However, new biomedical technologies which have been introduced in the critical area of human life and the family have given rise to further questions, in particular in the field of research on human embryos, the use of stem cells for therapeutic purposes, as well as in other areas of experimental medicine.
These new questions require answers.
The pace of scientific developments in this area and the publicity they have received have raised expectations and concerns in large sectors of public opinion.
Legislative assemblies have been asked to make decisions on these questions in order to regulate them by law; at times, wider popular consultation has also taken place.
These developments have led the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to prepare a new doctrinal Instruction which addresses some recent questions in the light of the criteria expressed in the Instruction Donum vitae and which also examines some issues that were treated earlier, but are in need of additional clarification.
In undertaking this study, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has benefited from the analysis of the Pontifical Academy for Life and has consulted numerous experts with regard to the scientific aspects of these questions, in order to address them with the principles of Christian anthropology.
In the current multifaceted philosophical and scientific context, a considerable number of scientists and philosophers, in the spirit of the Hippocratic Oath, see in medical science a service to human fragility aimed at the cure of disease, the relief of suffering and the equitable extension of necessary care to all people.
At the same time, however, there are also persons in the world of philosophy and science who view advances in biomedical technology from an essentially eugenic perspective. In presenting principles and moral evaluations regarding biomedical research on human life, the Catholic Church draws upon the light both of reason and of faith and seeks to set forth an integral vision of man and his vocation, capable of incorporating everything that is good in human activity, as well as in various cultural and religious traditions which not infrequently demonstrate a great reverence for life.
The Magisterium also seeks to offer a word of support and encouragement for the perspective on culture which considers science an invaluable service to the integral good of the life and dignity of every human being. The Church therefore views scientific research with hope and desires that many Christians will dedicate themselves to the progress of biomedicine and will bear witness to their faith in this field.
She hopes moreover that the results of such research may also be made available in areas of the world that are poor and afflicted by disease, so that those who are most in need will receive humanitarian assistance.
Finally, the Church seeks to draw near to every human being who is suffering, whether in body or in spirit, in order to bring not only comfort, but also light and hope.
These give meaning to moments of sickness and to the experience of death, which indeed are part of human life and are present in the story of every person, opening that story to the mystery of the Resurrection.
Yes, life will triumph because truth, goodness, joy and true progress are on the side of life. The present Instruction is addressed to the Catholic faithful and to all who seek the truth.
It has three parts: In recent decades, medical science has made significant strides in understanding human life in its initial stages.Archives and past articles from the Philadelphia Inquirer, Philadelphia Daily News, and iridis-photo-restoration.com BibMe Free Bibliography & Citation Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard.
COMPENDIUM OF THE SOCIAL DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH. INTRODUCTION. AN INTEGRAL AND SOLIDARY HUMANISM. a. At the dawn of the Third Millennium.
The Church moves further into the Third Millennium of the Christian era as a pilgrim people, guided by Christ, the “great Shepherd” (Heb ).He is the “Holy Door” (cf.
Jn ) . The American eugenics movement was rooted in the biological determinist ideas of Sir Francis Galton, which originated in the iridis-photo-restoration.com studied the upper classes of Britain, and arrived at the conclusion that their social positions were due to a superior genetic makeup.
Early proponents of eugenics believed that, through selective breeding, the human . Darwinian Theories of Human Nature (This is my summary of a section of a book I often used in university classes: Thirteen Theories of Human Nature, by Stevenson, Haberman, and Wright, Oxford Univ. iridis-photo-restoration.com is .
What is the best way for infertile couples to have a child? Should research into mechanical reproduction technologies be unlimited? What do we do about frozen embryos that won't be used by the donating couple?